TL;DR
article explains how to avoid slowing down your web app by canceling or aborting previous AJAX requests. It provides a code snippet that assigns the current AJAX request object to a variable and checks if it’s complete before initiating a new request, thus aborting the previous one. The article also includes a solution for ignoring the “abort” error that occurs when a previous request is canceled.
jQuery AJAX is the most common way to deal with AJAX requests these days. You can send as many Ajax requests as you like but there are many cases in which sending too many or frequent Ajax requests is not suitable and best avoided.
For example, let’s say you have developed a certain search functionality that fetches result data using AJAX. The search query string is the value of the input field bound with the Ajax function and is triggered on the keyup event on the input field. In this case, if the user has to enter a query string of let’s say 8 characters, this will mean that there’ll be at least 8 keyup events triggered, which further means that there’ll be at least 8 Ajax calls. This will definitely lead to a slowing of the whole app and is unreasonable as well.
The solution here is to only focus on the query string after the user has finished typing i.e. the last keyup event. So, for this, you have to cancel or abort all the previous Ajax requests.
Let’s say that the input field is as follows:
[PHP]
[/php]
Now, we have to write the code for the Ajax function which will be triggered on the key up event and will also abort the previous Ajax calls if any. So, our code for such a function will be as:
In the above code what’s happening is that we have assigned our $.ajax request to a variable ‘ajaxReq‘. This variable will hold the current Ajax request object and if another Ajax request is called before the previous one is completed it aborts the previous one. It does this by checking the condition set in the beforeSend function which fires before a new Ajax request is initiated.
Β The ajaxReq != ‘ToCancelPrevReq’ checks if the ajaxReq variable holds a previous ajax request object and the ajaxReq.readyState < 4 condition checks if that is complete or not. The readyState property can have 5 values depending on the status of the Ajax XMLHttpRequest, these are:
1: server connection established
2: request received
3: processing request
4: request finished and response is ready
You can learn more about XMLHttpRequest at:
https://www.w3schools.com/xml/ajax_xmlhttprequest_create.asp
The condition:

We are a Website Development, WebApp Development, and Digital Marketing Company, providing services to enterprises of all shapes and sizes, across the world. In our blog, we talk about the latest in Tech, Technical Tutorials, and our general opinions, among other things π Please feel free to reach us through the comment box or via the contact us page if you’d like to know more about our services.
Interesting article thank you for sharing
Glad you liked it π
gracias por compartir, me ayudo bastante.
de nada π
Sorry man! Your website doesn’t seem to work for me in any browser. Let me know if you need my help on anything else.
Hey Brajinder, Sorry to be the bearer of bad news, but at least two of three of the comments you’ve replied to so far are spam. You really should delete spam from your blog least you encourage more of the dreadful practice.
Thanks for the concern. May be they are may be they aren’t. The websites they have linked isn’t working. So, I’m going to give them the benefit of doubt here and leave it as it is. I have a few plugins which monitor spam. Still, thanks for your concern. Really appreciated.
Great, great, great, thanks for publishing. π
Glad to be of help π
I have 2 tabs, each tab have same function i.e. generateReport() which call same ajax call.
on the tab delete, i put a abort() function.
if i hit the both function, which create 2 ajax call. and delete 1no tab immediately then my abort function run and cancel the 2nd no ajax call.
expectation is 1no ajax call will be canceled.
Any idea about this issue?
Your logic seem flawed or I might be way off in thinking what you have done. Without seeing the actual implementation it’s hard for me to figure out. The best I can say at the moment is use ID based approach, and use this.id to make sure only the selector is acted upon. It’s been a lot of time since you posted it so I assume it’s resolved by now. Anyhow, thanks for going through π
Cool, thanks
Glad you liked it π